phet commented on code in PR #4013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/4013#discussion_r1701618512
##########
gobblin-service/src/main/java/org/apache/gobblin/service/modules/spec/JobExecutionPlanListDeserializer.java:
##########
@@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ public List<JobExecutionPlan> deserialize(JsonElement json,
Type typeOfT, JsonDe
JobExecutionPlan jobExecutionPlan = new JobExecutionPlan(jobSpec,
specExecutor);
jobExecutionPlan.setExecutionStatus(executionStatus);
+
jobExecutionPlan.setCurrentGeneration(serializedJobExecutionPlan.get(SerializationConstants.CURRENT_GENERATION_KEY).getAsInt());
+
jobExecutionPlan.setCurrentAttempts(serializedJobExecutionPlan.get(SerializationConstants.CURRENT_ATTEMPTS_KEY).getAsInt());
Review Comment:
on a meta level, this PR would be more cohesive as two, one for
PENDING_RETRY and the other for (de)serialization
##########
gobblin-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/gobblin/service/monitoring/FlowStatusGenerator.java:
##########
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
@Slf4j
public class FlowStatusGenerator {
public static final List<String> FINISHED_STATUSES =
Lists.newArrayList(ExecutionStatus.FAILED.name(),
- ExecutionStatus.COMPLETE.name(), ExecutionStatus.CANCELLED.name());
+ ExecutionStatus.COMPLETE.name(), ExecutionStatus.CANCELLED.name(),
ExecutionStatus.PENDING_RETRY.name());
Review Comment:
this is used in a number of places. is it acceptable to change the semantics
for all of them? e.g. is it OK here in `MysqlDMStateStore`:
```
public boolean hasRunningJobs(DagManager.DagId dagId) throws IOException {
return getDagNodes(dagId).stream()
.anyMatch(node ->
!FlowStatusGenerator.FINISHED_STATUSES.contains(node.getValue().getExecutionStatus().name()));
}
```
?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@gobblin.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
