phet commented on code in PR #4031:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/4031#discussion_r1744198051


##########
gobblin-service/src/main/java/org/apache/gobblin/service/modules/utils/FlowCompilationValidationHelper.java:
##########
@@ -50,16 +50,14 @@
 
 
 /**
- * Helper class with functionality meant to be re-used between the DagManager 
and Orchestrator when launching
+ * Helper class with functionality meant to be re-used between the 
LaunchDagProc and Orchestrator when launching
  * executions of a flow spec. In the common case, the Orchestrator receives a 
flow to orchestrate, performs necessary
- * validations, and forwards the execution responsibility to the DagManager. 
The DagManager's responsibility is to
- * carry out any flow action requests. However, with launch executions now 
being stored in the DagActionStateStore, on
- * restart or leadership change the DagManager has to perform validations 
before executing any launch actions the
- * previous leader was unable to complete. Rather than duplicating the code or 
introducing a circular dependency between
- * the DagManager and Orchestrator, this class is utilized to store the common 
functionality. It is stateful,
+ * validations, and creates DagActions. The DagProcessingEngine's 
responsibility is to
+ * process out dag action requests. However, with launch executions now being 
stored in the DagActionStateStore, on
+ * restart, the LaunchDagProc has to perform validations before executing any 
launch actions the previous LaunchDagProc

Review Comment:
   sorry, it's a minor point.  I was just saying that it could be that no dag 
proc has yet even tried to process the dag action.  hence all we can claim is 
that the DA is not yet fully processed.  overall, NBD



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to