Hi Lewis, I think GORA-182, GORA-170, and GORA-174 needs to be fixed before 0.3 and the rest we could bump it to 0.4
Most other bugs tagged with 0.3 are minor issues. I havent queried other issues that have not been tagged with 0.3 Just my 2-cents. Others are welcome to chime in of course =) - Henry On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Henry > Is it a serious proposal to bump all of the issues quoted thus far to > blocker for 0.3 release (the remaining issues can be bumped to 0.4) so we > have a clear vision for the 0.3 development drive? > Thanks > Lewis > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Hi Lewis, > > > > Thanks for starting this discussions. > > > > At least couple of the Jira issues you mentioned before are blocked > > with GORA-174. > > > > I think these are good list of blockers that are "must fix" and should be > > resolved before start preparing for 0.3 release. > > > > > > - Henry > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Firstly, Happy New Year everyone. I really hope that 2013 is a good > year > > > for everyone. > > > > > > It would be excellent to get a Gora 0.3 release done, however there > are a > > > couple of blocking issues. As I see it we have the following > > > > > > GORA-182 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-182> Nutch 2.1 > does > > > not work with gora-cassandra 0.2.1 > > > > > > GORA-170 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-170> Getting a > > > BufferUnderflowException in class CassandraColumn, method > > fromByteBuffer() > > > > > > GORA-188 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-188> > > testSerdeWebPage > > > failure - PersistentBase#equals() fails with map fields > > > > > > GORA-189 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-189> String > > > parameters > > > in generated Persistent subclasses by Compiler -not only Utf8- > > > > > > > > > The thing is that some of these are linked, and I also anticipate that > we > > > may run into other problems once some/all have been resolved so to > speak. > > > The purpose of this thread is to attempt to draw up some roadmap for > > > releasing, and of course to understand what is required in the > > development > > > drive for us to reach this target. > > > > > > Any input would be excellent. > > > > > > Best > > > > > > Lewis > > > > > > -- > > > *Lewis* > > > > > > > > > -- > *Lewis* >