hi all, I have reviewed the new arch, and will try to implement the dispatcher module in the coming days.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GRIFFIN/The+DQ+workflow+Architecture+Proposal https://github.com/apache/griffin/tree/griffin-1.0.0-dev I need to discuss with you the dispatcher interface with the core module. Thanks, Jianhua On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 6:54 AM William Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > hi Eugene, > > 1. We need to seamlessly migrate from old tasks to new workflows, some > modules will be optional in new workflows since old tasks lack them. > 2. I will draw some diagrams to illustrate it. > > Thanks, > William > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 5:07 PM Eugene Law <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi William > > > > Raised a few comments on arch, replaying here > > 1.Do we need to consider upgrading from old arch to new arch, like how to > > seamlessly migrate old Griffin tasks into the new one? > > 2.The arch diagram is focusing on service relationships, can you add > > component or deployment diagram to describe it from different angles? > > > > Thx > > > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 2:31 PM William Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Eugene, > > > > > > Granted. > > > Everyone can comment on our space. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > William > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 10:16 AM Eugene Law <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi William > > > > > > > > Could you grant comment permission on the confluence page? so it > will > > > ease > > > > the conversations of proposal discussion among the Griffin community. > > > > > > > > Thx > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:46 AM William Guo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > > > > > Some dev might also be interested to review our proposal for a new > > > arch. > > > > > Your thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > Please check this link to review. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GRIFFIN/The+DQ+workflow+Architecture+Proposal > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > William > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
