hi Willem, I'm preparing the roadmap in our jira, will finish it tomorrow.
Thanks, William On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 10:21 AM Willem Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > It is good to see we are planning a new version of the griffin. > I think we can write a roadmap to help users and other contributors to > know better about the whole process. > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:52 PM ding wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > hi jianhua > > > > I would like to join to implement the core module, and since it needs to > > communicate with dispatcher module. > > > > I will provide the communication protocol(interface) between core and > > dispatcher according to the architecture. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Wang > > > > William Guo <[email protected]> 於 2022年10月10日 週一 晚上7:42寫道： > > > > > Cool. > > > > > > Before we discuss, could you please document dispatcher design for us > to > > > review. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 6:20 PM jianhua guo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > > > I have reviewed the new arch, and will try to implement the > dispatcher > > > > module in the coming days. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GRIFFIN/The+DQ+workflow+Architecture+Proposal > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/griffin/tree/griffin-1.0.0-dev > > > > > > > > I need to discuss with you the dispatcher interface with the core > module. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Jianhua > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 6:54 AM William Guo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > hi Eugene, > > > > > > > > > > 1. We need to seamlessly migrate from old tasks to new workflows, > some > > > > > modules will be optional in new workflows since old tasks lack > them. > > > > > 2. I will draw some diagrams to illustrate it. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > William > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 5:07 PM Eugene Law <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi William > > > > > > > > > > > > Raised a few comments on arch, replaying here > > > > > > 1.Do we need to consider upgrading from old arch to new arch, > like > > > how > > > > to > > > > > > seamlessly migrate old Griffin tasks into the new one? > > > > > > 2.The arch diagram is focusing on service relationships, can you > add > > > > > > component or deployment diagram to describe it from different > angles? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thx > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 2:31 PM William Guo <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Eugene, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Granted. > > > > > > > Everyone can comment on our space. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > William > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 10:16 AM Eugene Law <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi William > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you grant comment permission on the confluence page? > so it > > > > > will > > > > > > > ease > > > > > > > > the conversations of proposal discussion among the Griffin > > > > community. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:46 AM William Guo < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some dev might also be interested to review our proposal > for a > > > > new > > > > > > > arch. > > > > > > > > > Your thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please check this link to review. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GRIFFIN/The+DQ+workflow+Architecture+Proposal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > William > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
