OK. I see :)
在 Cédric Champeau [via Groovy]
<ml-node+s329449n5736817...@n5.nabble.com>，2016年11月18日 下午9:18写道：
I agree with Jochen and Guillaume: +1 to !instanceof and !in, but I don't like
the other variants.
2016-11-18 14:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sun <[hidden email]>:
Hi Jochen,
> I think !instanceof and !in are ok. The others... not sure here. Right
> now a*=b, which means !< is >=. And in this
> case I actually prefer >=.
Sometimes we write code like "!(a > b)", now we can write "a !> b"
instead, which is much close to our mind :)
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
View this message in context:
http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736816.html
Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736817.html
To unsubscribe from Negative relational operators for Groovy 3, click
here<http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5736809&code=cmVhbGJsdWVzdW5AaG90bWFpbC5jb218NTczNjgwOXwxMTQ2MjE4MjI1>.
NAML<http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
--
View this message in context:
http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for-Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736819.html
Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
