I think we should support only explicit array initilization with array type,
that is "new int[] { 2 }" for compatibility's sake.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 24 Jan 2017, at 09:59, Daniel Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> or we just support new int[] {1,2,3} ？
>
>
>
> 在 "Guillaume Laforge [via Groovy]" <ml-node+[hidden email]>，2017年1月24日
> 16:54写道：
> What happens for def a = { 2 }, is it parsed as a closure or an array
> initializer?
>
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Daniel Sun <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi Andres,
>>
>> Parrot can parse ` def a = {1, 2, 3}` properly, but it can not parse
>> `{1, 2, 3}`, which is not supported by Java too.
>>
>> This is the initial implementation :)
>> https://github.com/danielsun1106/groovy-parser/commit/96e6c923a4d09d48448f8731a314c918ee6c0e7c
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel.Sun
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/About-array-initializer-of-Java-style-for-Groovy-3-tp5737941p5737944.html
>> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Laforge
> Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
> Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform
>
> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
> Social: @glaforge / Google+
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/About-array-initializer-of-Java-style-for-Groovy-3-tp5737941p5737945.html
> To unsubscribe from About array initializer of Java style for Groovy 3, click
> here.
> NAML
>
> View this message in context: Re: About array initializer of Java style for
> Groovy 3
> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
