I think these features are very similar. Expanding the "use" block's scope is basically the same as adding a global extension method, in my opinion (the entire "use" schema doesn't seem to have any advantages over extensions anyway). I think the best way forward is to get an experimental, working implementation of same-module extensions. Once again, the syntax I mentioned removes the necessity for annotations or special import statements. Perhaps for temporary purposes an annotation should be introduced. What do you think about this?
-- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
