I actually find that less readable, and feel like it would get even worse with multiple parameters. I’m not sure I see what the value here would be.
A. On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 8:39 AM Daniel.Sun <sun...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I propose to introduce Concatenative Method Calls to Groovy. It can > make code more readable, for example: > > Currently we write method calls like: > y = foo(x) > z = bar(y) > w = baz(z) > OR > w = baz(bar(foo(x))) > > Concatenative Method Calls(inspired by [1]): > w = x => foo => bar => baz > > Any thoughts? > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concatenative_programming_language > > > > -- > Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html >
