Hi Guillaume,
I have to admit closure is very versatile...
In practice, chained closures are a bit verbose :-(
(obj1.&m1 >> obj2.&m2 >> obj3.&m3)(someParam)
In addition, chained closures seems not to support multiple parameters.
While I propose the following syntax to support multiple parameters.
(x, y) => m1 => (m2, param) => m3
P.S. I like Jesper proposed |> to replace =>
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
