My opinion is that it should be left as 2.6. Since 2.6 has already undergone several pre-releases I think it will may be more confusing to re-number now. Renumbering may also give the impression that a 2.7 or 2.8 might be coming or at least make some wonder what happened to those versions.
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 8:58 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote: > > Hi, > > I was wondering what people thought about renumbering Groovy 2.6 to 2.9. > It is only a subtle change but I think better conveys that it isn't a > small step up > from 2.5 but rather something just a bit short of 3. > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, Paul. > >
