Well, /** has been in use for more than 20 years, so we've had time to get used to it. /**@ is totally non-obvious. I've no idea what it would have been about without having read this thread.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 4:28 AM MG <mg...@arscreat.com> wrote: > I agree with Daniel, I think > /**@ > would be neither more nor less cryptic than > /** > which everyone is just used to from Java (and which seems to have no > memnonic / self-explanatory characteristics to me...). > > Cheers, > mg > > > On 21.10.2018 03:04, Daniel.Sun wrote: > > Hi Guillaume, > > > > Javadoc switch `/**` is cryptic too at the beginning, but now I > > believe few people like the following form ;-) > > > > /* > > * @Javadoc > > * some Javadoc here > > */ > > > > Cheers, > > Daniel.Sun > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > Daniel Sun > > Apache Groovy committer > > Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me > > Twitter: @daniel_sun > > > > -- > > Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html > > > > -- Guillaume Laforge Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ Twitter: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge>
