Can the open collective team recognize significant achievements in the 
community and make awards?  You could announce one award per major conference 
(Gr8conf, Greach, Whatever2gm).

________________________________
From: Søren Berg Glasius <soe...@glasius.dk>
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 9:50 AM
To: dev@groovy.apache.org
Cc: Jochen Theodorou
Subject: Re: Groovy Champions proposal feedback

How can we revive this discussion? I still think it's relevant.

:)

Best regards / Med venlig hilsen,
Søren Berg Glasius

Hedevej 1, Gl. Rye, 8680 Ry, Denmark
Mobile: +45 40 44 91 88, Skype: sbglasius
--- Press ESC once to quit - twice to save the changes.


On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 at 17:40, MG <mg...@arscreat.com<mailto:mg...@arscreat.com>> 
wrote:
...and, of course, the

Apache Groovy Community Lifetime Achievement Award

;-)

Like the name, +1 (again) on tying the award to a specific year, don't
think that mixing commit access with the award makes sense (as in
programming: Keep things single purpose - nobdy wants to be fat, be it
class or human ;-) )


On 02.03.2018 10:11, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I was thinking a while about all this and all the problems involved
> here and I want to show an alternative.
>
> Apache Groovy Community Award
>
> Name surely to be changed. The idea is to give a nominal award for
> what they did in the past. Somebody getting this award will get this
> for a reason, which is to be stated.
>
> Since it is no title like "champion" and since we can give a
> description of the reasons the award will be always specific, it is
> not a title you carry around your lifetime and all of that. Maybe a
> person could be awarded multiple times, but that is then to decide.
> That means there will be no discussions about revoking the
> championship, or for how long this is granted. Also I think the award
> leaves better space for a good naming. Also we can give commit access
> along with it, which may or may not be taken, but then includes the
> official ASF way of recognizing people.
>
> what do you guys think?
>
> bye Jochen
>

Reply via email to