+1 (binding)

Checked CHECKSUMs, signatures.
Code builds and test suite runs from source.
Ran some manual exploratory tests for groovy, groovyc, groovydoc, groovysh,
groovyConsole.


On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:27 AM Daniel.Sun <sun...@apache.org> wrote:

> Dear development community,
>
> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2 release!
>
> This release includes 40 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the
> changelog:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12345498
>
> Tag:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_3_0_0_BETA_2
> Tag commit id: ca8205f62726af165ac396be1bbfaa194aed482c
>
> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r34788).
> Source release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.0-beta-2/sources
> Convenience binaries:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.0-beta-2/distribution
>
> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/KEYS
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2.
>
> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with
> sha256sum):
> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2
> [ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-beta-2 because...
>
> Here is my vote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Apache Groovy committer & PMC member
> Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me
> Twitter: @daniel_sun
>
> --
> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
>

Reply via email to