Hi,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Paul King <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ==== CS10
...
> There is this page here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/groovy.html
>
> We didn't spell out PMC/PPMC on that page. If we did, would that be
> what is expected?..
Yes but that's kind of duplicate information.
Actually, this is only relevant once the project graduates, as the
current podling's PMC does not have formal decision power.
I have changed CS10 to "OK: will be at
people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#groovy-pmc once the
project graduates."
> $ gradlew dependencies
> gives a fairly comprehensive list of dependencies including build.tool
> dependencies.
Am I correct that the below "runtime" output of that represents what's
needed to use Groovy? If yes we need IMO to document the licenses of
these libraries, maybe just in a jira ticket so we keep a trace of it.
I don't see any potential problems, it's just to do that cleanly.
-Bertrand
runtime - Runtime classpath for source set 'main'.
+--- antlr:antlr:2.7.7
+--- org.ow2.asm:asm:5.0.3
+--- org.ow2.asm:asm-analysis:5.0.3
| \--- org.ow2.asm:asm-tree:5.0.3
| \--- org.ow2.asm:asm:5.0.3
+--- org.ow2.asm:asm-commons:5.0.3
| \--- org.ow2.asm:asm-tree:5.0.3 (*)
+--- org.ow2.asm:asm-tree:5.0.3 (*)
+--- org.ow2.asm:asm-util:5.0.3
| \--- org.ow2.asm:asm-tree:5.0.3 (*)
+--- commons-cli:commons-cli:1.3.1
+--- org.apache.ant:ant:1.9.6
| \--- org.apache.ant:ant-launcher:1.9.6
+--- com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream:1.4.8
+--- com.googlecode:openbeans:1.0
+--- org.fusesource.jansi:jansi:1.11
+--- org.apache.ivy:ivy:2.4.0
\--- org.codehaus.gpars:gpars:1.2.1
+--- org.multiverse:multiverse-core:0.7.0
\--- org.codehaus.jsr166-mirror:jsr166y:1.7.0
