No, it is ok on the source, even though we could have used the groovy-website wiki section.
2015-10-15 21:14 GMT+02:00 Keegan Witt <[email protected]>: > Would Apache's Confluence <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/> instance > be a more appropriate place for these kinds of things? > > -Keegan > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Cédric Champeau < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The only problem is that each change triggers a CI build ;) >> >> 2015-10-15 20:59 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:52PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Cédric Champeau >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > ...I like the idea of having concrete, non >>> > > subjective criteria for graduating, even if it could mean in our >>> case that >>> > > graduating would be "stricter".... >>> > >>> > We're down to 4 TODOs already, and all of them look quite easy to fix. >>> >>> Looks like 3, actually, and the rest seems to be in order! Last time we >>> did >>> it on the project website, but having this in the source code is even >>> better, >>> IMO! Thanks a lot for taking a lead on this! >>> >>> Cos >>> >>> >> >
