I think this should be 3.0. 2015-11-01 11:37 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com>:
> Sounds worth a 2.5 with all this. > > What do you think of the Java 8 related syntax elements? > More for 2.6, or even 3.0? > (but we need to decide which ones we want to address and how anyway) > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Cédric Champeau < > cedric.champ...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> At least, releasing a first beta shouldn't be too hard. There are >> basically 3 things I'd like to see in 2.5: >> >> - the new macro stuff, including the AST matcher, which is still WIP, but >> ready to test >> - a new sandoxing based on what I described in a blog post [1]. This is >> not implemented. >> - the global flag on @ASTTest to enable it only in tests. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Cédric >> >> [1] http://melix.github.io/blog/2015/03/sandboxing.html >> >> 2015-11-01 11:23 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi Pascal, >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Pascal Schumacher < >>> pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello everybody, >>>> >>>> when do we plan to release Groovy 2.5? >>> >>> >>> That's a good question, but I think we should decide first what we want >>> to put in this release :-) >>> >>> -- >>> Guillaume Laforge >>> Apache Groovy committer & PMC member >>> Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet <http://restlet.com> >>> >>> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ >>> Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ >>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Guillaume Laforge > Apache Groovy committer & PMC member > Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet <http://restlet.com> > > Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ > Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ > <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts> >
