yes, thx.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Keegan Witt <keeganw...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you meant https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7569 > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Thibault Kruse <tibokr...@googlemail.com> > wrote: >> >> I had created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-756 for >> this. I can try adding use-cases there. >> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Cédric Champeau >> <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I'm not sure about the changes to power asserts. For simple expressions, >> > this shouldn't be much of a problem, however things are not always that >> > simple, so adding information like types or hashcode may easily become >> > unreadable. I would suggest to create a proposal (spec?) with some >> > examples, >> > with the current output and the new output, for a good number of use >> > cases. >> > This would at least help me making my mind. >> > >> > 2015-11-01 12:23 GMT+01:00 Thibault Kruse <tibokr...@googlemail.com>: >> >> >> >> Not sure if anyone else cares, but I would still like to propose the >> >> changes to the power assert (more verbose type information). >> >> See >> >> >> >> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Should-PowerAsserts-be-more-verbose-td5727255.html >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Cédric Champeau >> >> <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I think this should be 3.0. >> >> > >> >> > 2015-11-01 11:37 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> >> >> >> Sounds worth a 2.5 with all this. >> >> >> >> >> >> What do you think of the Java 8 related syntax elements? >> >> >> More for 2.6, or even 3.0? >> >> >> (but we need to decide which ones we want to address and how anyway) >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Cédric Champeau >> >> >> <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> At least, releasing a first beta shouldn't be too hard. There are >> >> >>> basically 3 things I'd like to see in 2.5: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> - the new macro stuff, including the AST matcher, which is still >> >> >>> WIP, >> >> >>> but >> >> >>> ready to test >> >> >>> - a new sandoxing based on what I described in a blog post [1]. >> >> >>> This >> >> >>> is >> >> >>> not implemented. >> >> >>> - the global flag on @ASTTest to enable it only in tests. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Cheers, >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Cédric >> >> >>> >> >> >>> [1] http://melix.github.io/blog/2015/03/sandboxing.html >> >> >>> >> >> >>> 2015-11-01 11:23 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com>: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Hi Pascal, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Pascal Schumacher >> >> >>>> <pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Hello everybody, >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> when do we plan to release Groovy 2.5? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> That's a good question, but I think we should decide first what we >> >> >>>> want >> >> >>>> to put in this release :-) >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> -- >> >> >>>> Guillaume Laforge >> >> >>>> Apache Groovy committer & PMC member >> >> >>>> Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ >> >> >>>> Social: @glaforge / Google+ >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Guillaume Laforge >> >> >> Apache Groovy committer & PMC member >> >> >> Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet >> >> >> >> >> >> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ >> >> >> Social: @glaforge / Google+ >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > >
