Alexey Petrenko wrote: > 2006/11/13, Andrey Chernyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Seems like we don't have any VM at the moment which would be really >> using the hythr from classlib. Even IBM VME doesn't use the hythr. As >> Tim wrote earlier, VME is using it's own threading library called >> j9thr23 [1]. Does it differ a much from the hythr? > > Is that really so? Tim?
That is really so, and it does not differ greatly from hythr. >> Guess it might be favourable for the classlib + IBM VME stack as well >> if it was using a single thread library. Would it be possible for VME >> to include a straightforward hythr implementation which can delegate >> hythread_* calls to the j9thr23? > > I do not quite understand this approach... :( > How it will look like? We keep hythr library in bin directory and it > forwards the calls to VM specific threading library? That appears to be the proposal. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
