2006/11/27, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail Loenko wrote: > I'm ok with that timeline. We probably need goals for "dotted" > releases also (like 5.1 where we can improve for example performance) I'm not sure, but I thought we can only release 5.0_01 if Sun didn't have 5.1?
yes, you are right. I've meant that we can have one more release for the 5.0 spec Thanks, Mikhail
> > Thanks, > Mikhail > > 2006/11/27, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I noticed that I've said the following several times, and it's really >> not for me to say, but for us to say. >> >> Does anyone have a problem with the following "high-level" time line? >> >> >> >> Mid 2007 : Java SE 5 >> >> End 2007 : Java SE 6 (meaning we have to start thinking about Java SE 6 >> classlib changes...) >> >> End 2008 : Java SE 7 (this really means "we'll do Java SE 7 when Sun >> does Java SE 7...") >> >> >> >> geir >> > -- Paulex Yang China Software Development Lab IBM
