2006/12/14, Mikhail Markov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 12/14/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2006/12/14, Mikhail Markov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 12/14/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > 1. How will we choose people to give "contributor" access to JIRA? > > This should be discussed here :-). One of the easiest possible solutions > is > > to automatically grant this access after particular number of posts to > dev > > list + actions with JIRAs. > As we all knows number of posts does not tell anything about the person :) Agree, but this could be an indicator for considering the person as a candidate for JIRA contributor
Or an ability to write a spam bot :)
> Another option is to use the same procedure as for granting committer > > status (but have less strict requirements). > OK > > > 2. As far as I understood the main point here is to give a possibility > > > for non-committers to assign bugs. So non-committers can search for > > > non-assigned bugs. Right? > > The main point is to quicker process JIRAs not requiring committing to > svn + > > some small things like > > "Patch available" > I see two solutions here: > 1. Ask bug creator to set this flag if he/she happy with the resolution. > 2. Let set this tag to everybody (if it is possible) > I like first one more.
First approach will prevent us from false positives. If issue creator is happy with the fix it means that issue is fixed. In most cases... :)
I prefer the second one :-)
Here could be the false positives... SY, Alexey
