This is even better! +1 Regards, Mikhail
On 12/14/06, Pavel Ozhdikhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I support Milhail's proposal - the possibility to work directly with JIRA issuess looks attractive to me. Probably we should not allow to close JIRA issues to everyone - it can be done by the committer who integrated the patch. Let's let everyone to assign the issue to him/herself, set patch available status - everything that is needed for every day work with an issue. Thank you, Pavel On 12/14/06, Mikhail Markov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/14/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 2006/12/14, Mikhail Markov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On 12/14/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > 1. How will we choose people to give "contributor" access to JIRA? > > > This should be discussed here :-). One of the easiest possible > solutions > > is > > > to automatically grant this access after particular number of posts to > > dev > > > list + actions with JIRAs. > > As we all knows number of posts does not tell anything about the person > :) > > > Agree, but this could be an indicator for considering the person as a > candidate for JIRA contributor > > > > Another option is to use the same procedure as for granting committer > > > status (but have less strict requirements). > > OK > > > > > 2. As far as I understood the main point here is to give a possibility > > > > for non-committers to assign bugs. So non-committers can search for > > > > non-assigned bugs. Right? > > > The main point is to quicker process JIRAs not requiring committing to > > svn + > > > some small things like > > > "Patch available" > > I see two solutions here: > > 1. Ask bug creator to set this flag if he/she happy with the resolution. > > 2. Let set this tag to everybody (if it is possible) > > > > I like first one more. > > > I prefer the second one :-) We could make a separate thread on this. > > > > "In progress" tags. > > I think we can let to set this flag to everybody. > > And this is probably a good idea! > > > Agree (we could discuss this in the same separate thread as the above > question. > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > > SY, Alexey > > > >
