Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 12/18/06, Mark Hindess wrote:
On 18 December 2006 at 13:43, "Alexey Varlamov" wrote:
> Stepan,
>
> I thougth we agreed to drop "signed" prefix. See also comment in the
> depends.properties:
> --------------------
> # will the next person to update bcprov.jar please remove the "signed."
> # prefix from the bcprov.jar property
> bcprov.dir=${depends.jars}/bcprov-jdk15-134
> bcprov.jar=${bcprov.dir}/signed.bcprov.jar
> --------------------
Indeed. The 'signed.' prefix was left when I removed the 'unsigning'
step that we needed a while back. I couldn't remove the prefix without
making unnecessary work for developers so I left it to be removed next
time developers had to fetch a new version.
Mark, sorry about that. I forgot to remove the prefix in the last moment.
BTW, what do you mean by saying "I couldn't remove the prefix without
making
unnecessary work for developers"?
And, is this something we can just decide to grit our teeth and do it so
we don't have this same conversation in a month ? :)
geir
Thanks,
Stepan.
-Mark.
> 2006/12/18, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 12/14/06, Leo Li wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, all:
> > > When fixing the bug of Harmony-2678, I found Harmony fails to
get the
> > > AlgorithmParameters for the algorithm "OAEP" because of the
> > > signed.bcprov.jar used lacks a class called "
> > > org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.JDKAlgorithmParameters$OAEP ". But it
exist
> s
> > > in the latest release version of Bouncy Castle and I replace the
current
> > > used jar with bcprov-jdk15-134.jar and everything is OK.
> > > So shall we update the signed.bcprov.jar? If it is, I will
give
a
> > > patch to the renew the make/depends.properties.
> >
> >
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > I've applied your patch for upgrading version of Bounce Castle
provider
> > (from HARMONY-2678).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan.
> >
