Thanks Alexei, that's not a bad idea, we can find all TODOs in exclude lists rather than src code. I'll try if no one object.
On 2/28/07, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tony, IIRC we have agreed that commenting out test code is not the best possible solution. Can we just split off proxy-related tests into a separate test class (<something>ProxyTest for example) and then put this new class to exclude list? Thanks, 2007/2/27, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello all, > I have been working on moving out the exclude tests in java.net these > days. Some of them need a proxy server. IIRC we have adopted jetty to > avoid external server dependencies before, but unfortunately, the > ProxyHandler of Jetty has not been implemented yet. So I purpose to > comment out the proxy related testcases and move out the test class > from exclude list. I'll add a TODO in the code and wait for the > upcoming new version of Jetty. > > Another way is tha find out another tool to set up a proxy server. In > my opinion, we'd better not import another dependency if possible. And > if it is not an embedding server, we have to write some ugly code in > order to run test automatically. > > suggestions?concerns? > > -- > Tony Wu > China Software Development Lab, IBM > -- Alexei Zakharov, Intel ESSD
-- Tony Wu China Software Development Lab, IBM
