My thought was that if we have a JIRA related "discussion" on the list, the intent is possibly to invite more comments, not just from the submitter and reviewer. If one feels that this broader participation or interest is necessary, it may be a good idea for whoever posts it on the list to add a few words to provide some context and background on the problem, which should not be hard to do. Otherwise, the discussion stays closed.
On 3/6/07, Salikh Zakirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rana Dasgupta wrote: > IMHO we may be better off if we post brief discussions on > commits/reviews on > the JIRA, rather than on the list, unless it is an architectural issue or > one where several opinions could add value. There seem to be several > threads > where the entire thread consists of a single post and a response :-) Rana, there is nothing wrong in a single post and a response, because the purpose of harmony-dev posting is to discuss things *in public*, rather than having hot discussions all the time. Should Weldon posted his comment in JIRA, I would probably miss it. And, by the way, using locks *is* an architectural issue.
