What we need I think is completeness metrics. Since those differences that are caused by newer specs are OK, they don't affect completeness.
So the real API completeness might be higher than what we see now. Having the real picture would help us to first stick those really unimplemented classes remained and second better position our state So it's good to have both: compatibility that Stuart is currently measuring and completeness to what we want to achive. Thanks, Mikhail 2007/4/26, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail Loenko wrote: > well, let's resume discussion whether Harmony must contain implementation > of the endorsed specs of the same version as RI or may contain a newer > version > > Tim, could you please comment on that? Only to say that the SE spec allows for us to implement a later version of these endorsed external specifications; however, Stuart is measuring compatibility to Sun's implementation, not compliance. We should expect to see a difference to the extent that the Corba code is incompatible with previous versions. Regards, Tim
