Mikhail Loenko wrote: > What we need I think is completeness metrics. Since those differences > that are caused by newer specs are OK, they don't affect completeness. > > So the real API completeness might be higher than what we see now. > Having the real picture would help us to first stick those really > unimplemented > classes remained and second better position our state > > So it's good to have both: compatibility that Stuart is currently measuring > and completeness to what we want to achive.
No objection here. Tim
