+1 for both. We now have stable gc_gen which is more advanced in GC algorithms than gc_cc. We now have stable verifier which is smaller and faster than old one.
Pavel. On 2/13/08, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there is a number of bugs in gc_cc and not that many volunteers to fix them, > do we need to continue support it or we better move to archive? > > the same for original verifier: a number of bugs found in both > verifiers were fixed in the default one (verifier-3363) only, should > we move the original one into archive? > > Thanks, > Mikhail >
