+1 also gc_gen has now equipped with semi-space GC algorithms so the last strong advantage of gc_cc vs. gc_gen disappeared.
Thanks, Aleksey. On Feb 13, 2008 4:30 PM, Vladimir Beliaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 also for both > > 2008/2/13, Pavel Pervov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > +1 for both. > > > > We now have stable gc_gen which is more advanced in GC algorithms than > > gc_cc. > > We now have stable verifier which is smaller and faster than old one. > > > > Pavel. > > > > On 2/13/08, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > there is a number of bugs in gc_cc and not that many volunteers to fix > > them, > > > do we need to continue support it or we better move to archive? > > > > > > the same for original verifier: a number of bugs found in both > > > verifiers were fixed in the default one (verifier-3363) only, should > > > we move the original one into archive? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mikhail > > > > > > > > > -- > Vladimir Beliaev > Intel Middleware Products Division >
