Egor, I'm not aware of any regular measurements of Harmony memory footprint.
Pavel. On 10 Mar 2008 18:05:51 +0300, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the 0x401 day of Apache Harmony Nathan Beyer wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nataly Naumova wrote: > > > > I've measured the startup performance for simple applications, speedup > > > > was ~2-3% on simple graphics aplication with lots of AWT/SWING > > > > classes. But I think the idea is quite pretty, because of we get rid > > > > of a big amount of system calls, such as lseek, read etc. As we're > > > > working just with pointers directly. > > > > > > Understood, but to increase the runtime footprint by 20Mb is bad IMHO. > > > > What's the total footprint? What was it before? The RI has a ~25M > > footprint for general uses the last time I checked. > > Do we measure DRLVM footprint regularly? Is there something in BTI to > facilitate this? Say, we can have some reference startup footprints > like Eclipse, JEdit (more?). Did anybody compare them to RI? > > To detect bottlenecks it is also important to know what part of the > footprint is heap, what is JITted code, what is other stuff. Is > there any handy function to measure this? (if at performance cost, > it's OK) > > Offtopicly, I regularly worry about footprint impact of Jitrino > optimizations, where inliner is most notable, you know. Looks as if > everybody sees the picture, but not me :) > > -- > Egor Pasko > > -- Pavel Pervov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
