Thanks, Pavel! I believe that your idea of making a questionable option configurable is the best way to resolve these concerns.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Pavel Pervov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xiao-Feng, > > Yes, in the patch I've also added command line option to change that > behaviour (actually, patch _adds_ jar mapping, not _changes_ file > reads to mapping). > I made it on by default in the patch but I can change it to off before > committing and keep this functionality as a potential performance > optimization on some scenarios. > > Pavel. > > > > On 3/7/08, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Nataly Naumova > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Tim, > > > > > > I've measured the startup performance for simple applications, speedup > > > was ~2-3% on simple graphics aplication with lots of AWT/SWING > > > classes. But I think the idea is quite pretty, because of we get rid > > > of a big amount of system calls, such as lseek, read etc. As we're > > > working just with pointers directly. > > > > Can it be a runtime option chosen by the user? > > > > Thanks, > > xiaofeng > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Pavel Pervov (JIRA) wrote: > > > > > Please, note, that memory footprint of DRLVM will increase by size > of > > > > > JRE, namely, ~20 megs. > > > > > > > > Eek, that's quite significant! What's the speed-up by doing this? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Nataly Naumova, > > > Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com > > > > > > > -- > Pavel Pervov, > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division > -- With best regards, Alexei
