Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
I don't know how Ian wants to roll out his RVM visualization proposal.
Ian, do you plan to enhance GCspy with TuningFork idea or to migrate
RVM to work with the TuningFork framework?
Hi Xiao Feng,
the proposal actually comes from Richard Jones [1] so I'd like to defer
to him. My experience of visualization in GCspy was that it was a
little hard to get going. In the meantime tuning fork has been actively
maintained. My feeling is that migrating the RVM to work with tuning
fork would be a better idea than to breathe life back into GC spy's
visualization - but this is based on my limited experience.
Regards,
Ian
[1] http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/~rej
