After works on HARMONY-6020 now we get 98.42% pass rate for 26416 test cases
when running EUT35 in win32 platform as below.
Tests
Failures Errors Success rate
org.eclipse.ui.tests 2143
19 1 99.07%
org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model 11138
0 6 99.95%
org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler 10216
17 0 99.83%
org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder 195
0 184 5.64%
org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.performance 1
0 0 100.00%
org.eclipse.team.tests.core 17
0 0 100.00%
org.eclipse.update.tests 131
0 0 100.00%
org.eclipse.core.expressions.tests 98
0 0 100.00%
org.eclipse.osgi.tests 504
48 101 70.44%
org.eclipse.core.tests.resources 914
7 29 96.06%
org.eclipse.core.tests.runtime 389
1 0 99.74%
org.eclipse.compare.tests 80
0 0 100.00%
org.eclipse.ant.tests.core 85
0 0 100.00%
org.eclipse.releng.tests 5
0 0 100.00%
org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests 500
0 0 100.00%
Totally: 26416
92 321 98.42%
More details are posted in HARMONY-6062.
regards,
chunrong
Managed Runtime Technology Center, Intel
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Nathan Beyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I posted a comment about this on the JIRA issue - I think this is
> related to a class loading problem I found a few weeks ago. The
> ClassNotFoundError looked familiar - I reduced it to a complex
> cyclical class dependency that DRLVM couldn't load.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6020
>
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:32 PM, chunrong lai <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > hi, colleagues:
> > I'd like to update my running status of EUT35 with you. As reported in
> > HARMONY-6062, I have not been able to run EUT35 with Harmony (although it
> is
> > fine to run EUT33 with it).
> > The failure can be reproduced with the long java command line option
> > "java -jar
> > eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar
> > -application org.eclipse.test.uitestapplication -data workspace -dev bin
> >
> formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultFormatter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSuite.xml
> > -testPluginName org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests -className
> > org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSuite -os win32 -ws win32 -arch
> x86".
> > I also attached the output file in the JIRA, where I guess the root cause
> > are from some Harmony jar file constrains, "!MESSAGE Missing Constraint:
> > Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: JavaSE-1.6".
> > Another interesting point is that after the test case had successfully
> > runed (so the configuration phase has been finished) with RI (with above
> > command), it would be no problem for Harmony to run it again. This
> somehow
> > supports our guess of some verification failures in the configuration
> phase.
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:37 PM, chunrong lai <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I am running the tests, not finished yet.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Are you looking at this Chunrong?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Tim Ellison wrote:
> >>> > chunrong lai wrote:
> >>> >> So far Harmony has only EUT3.3 in testing. It looks like it is
> time
> >>> to
> >>> >> include EUT3.4 now. Your suggestions/comments are welcome.
> >>> >
> >>> > Skip 3.4 and go straight to the 3.5 stream tests [1].
> >>> >
> >>> > It would be prudent to test using the latest milestone build first
> [2],
> >>> > but if we want to remain current then catching any issues earlier in
> the
> >>> > integration builds would be the thing to do.
> >>> >
> >>> > How about running then using the Apache infrastructure, which would
> give
> >>> > us better control of the jobs and insight into the failures?
> >>> >
> >>> > [1] http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/
> >>> > [2]
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.5M3-200810301917/index.php
> >>> >
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> > Tim
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
