I run it with runtests -properties eut.run.properties jdtcorebuilder or D:\eclipse-testing>java -jar eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar -application org.eclipse.test.coretestapplication -data workspace -dev bin formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultFormatter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder.BuilderTests.xml -testPluginName org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder -className org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder.BuilderTests -os win32 -ws win32 -arch x86 after manual clean/extraction.
I also tried "runtests -properties eut.run.properties" and saw those jdtcorebuilder errors are reproducible. On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Nathan Beyer <[email protected]> wrote: > When I don't specificy "-vm", then it uses the 'java' executable in my > path that Sun's public JRE installed, for all invocations. All I have > set in my properties file is the "J2SE-1.5" property. What does the > "jvm" property do? > > I presume you're running "runtests -properties eut.run.properties all". > > -Nathan > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:19 PM, chunrong lai <[email protected]> > wrote: > > hi, Nathan: > > I have not tried 3.5M4 but just tried 3.5M3. > > According to the attched "Readme.htm", one only needs to specify the > > (J2SE) item of eut.run.properties (I attached mine) and then run > > > > runtests -properties <path to properties file> [-os <operating system>] > [-ws > > <windowing system>] [-arch <architecture>] [-noclean] [-vm <path to java > > executable>][-Dtest.target=performance][targetname1 targetname2 > targetname3 > > etc...] > > for that. You can read the "Requirements" session in it. It seems > that > > the requirements (winzip, ant) are minimum. > > Detailed steps of the testing can be found in > > http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-PDE-Automation/automation.html(around > > Fig 13). > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Nathan Beyer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> I've been trying to recreate these errors, can anyone share the > >> specific commands, settings and tools being used? > >> > >> I'm trying this with the 3.5M4 builds and I can't even get the 'ant' > >> test to run when Harmony is the bootstrapping JRE and the JRE running > >> the actual tests. > >> > >> -Nathan > >> > >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Gregory Shimansky > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On 7 January 2009 Huang, Eric wrote: > >> >> Did not cath this one earlier. What is the jrt.core.tests.builder > >> >> about? It > >> >> almost failed completely. > >> > > >> > It looks like almost all tests fail with the same exception message: > >> > > >> > Build path contains duplicate > >> > entry: > >> > > 'D:harmony.cc/trunk/working_vm/build/windows_x86_msvc_release/deploy/jdk/jre/bin/default/gc_gen.jar' > >> > for project 'Project' > >> > > >> > Interesting how there is no '/' or '\' after D: in the path name. Is > it > >> > a > >> > valid path in win32? > >> > > >> >> Eric > >> >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- > >> >> From: chunrong lai [mailto:[email protected]] > >> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:32 PM > >> >> To: [email protected] > >> >> Subject: Re: testing for the newer EUT > >> >> > >> >> After works on HARMONY-6020 now we get 98.42% pass rate for 26416 > test > >> >> cases when running EUT35 in win32 platform as below. > >> >> > >> >> Tests > >> >> Failures Errors Success rate > >> >> org.eclipse.ui.tests 2143 > >> >> 19 1 99.07% > >> >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model 11138 > >> >> 0 6 99.95% > >> >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler 10216 > >> >> 17 0 99.83% > >> >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder 195 > >> >> 0 184 5.64% > >> >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.performance 1 > >> >> 0 0 100.00% > >> >> org.eclipse.team.tests.core 17 > >> >> 0 0 100.00% > >> >> org.eclipse.update.tests 131 > >> >> 0 0 100.00% > >> >> org.eclipse.core.expressions.tests 98 > >> >> 0 0 100.00% > >> >> org.eclipse.osgi.tests 504 > >> >> 48 101 70.44% > >> >> org.eclipse.core.tests.resources 914 > >> >> 7 29 96.06% > >> >> org.eclipse.core.tests.runtime 389 > >> >> 1 0 99.74% > >> >> org.eclipse.compare.tests 80 > >> >> 0 0 100.00% > >> >> org.eclipse.ant.tests.core 85 > >> >> 0 0 100.00% > >> >> org.eclipse.releng.tests 5 > >> >> 0 0 100.00% > >> >> org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests 500 > >> >> 0 0 100.00% > >> >> > >> >> Totally: 26416 > >> >> 92 321 98.42% > >> >> > >> >> More details are posted in HARMONY-6062. > >> >> > >> >> regards, > >> >> chunrong > >> >> Managed Runtime Technology Center, Intel > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Nathan Beyer <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > I posted a comment about this on the JIRA issue - I think this is > >> >> > related to a class loading problem I found a few weeks ago. The > >> >> > ClassNotFoundError looked familiar - I reduced it to a complex > >> >> > cyclical class dependency that DRLVM couldn't load. > >> >> > > >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6020 > >> >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:32 PM, chunrong lai > >> >> > <[email protected]> > >> >> > > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > hi, colleagues: > >> >> > > I'd like to update my running status of EUT35 with you. As > >> >> > > reported > >> >> > > in HARMONY-6062, I have not been able to run EUT35 with Harmony > >> >> > > (although it > >> >> > > >> >> > is > >> >> > > >> >> > > fine to run EUT33 with it). > >> >> > > The failure can be reproduced with the long java command line > >> >> > > option > >> >> > > "java -jar > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar > >> >> > > -application org.eclipse.test.uitestapplication -data workspace > >> >> > > -dev > >> >> > > bin > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultForm > >> >> > >> >> > > >atter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSui > >> >> >te.xml > >> >> > > >> >> > > -testPluginName org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests -className > >> >> > > org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSuite -os win32 -ws win32 > >> >> > > -arch > >> >> > > >> >> > x86". > >> >> > > >> >> > > I also attached the output file in the JIRA, where I guess the > root > >> >> > > cause are from some Harmony jar file constrains, "!MESSAGE > Missing > >> >> > > Constraint: Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: JavaSE-1.6". > >> >> > > Another interesting point is that after the test case had > >> >> > > successfully runed (so the configuration phase has been finished) > >> >> > > with > >> >> > > RI (with above command), it would be no problem for Harmony to > run > >> >> > > it > >> >> > > again. This > >> >> > > >> >> > somehow > >> >> > > >> >> > > supports our guess of some verification failures in the > >> >> > > configuration > >> >> > > >> >> > phase. > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:37 PM, chunrong lai > >> >> > > <[email protected]> > >> >> > > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> I am running the tests, not finished yet. > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> Thanks. > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Tim Ellison > >> >> > >> <[email protected] > >> >> > > > >> >> > >wrote: > >> >> > >>> Are you looking at this Chunrong? > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> Tim Ellison wrote: > >> >> > >>> > chunrong lai wrote: > >> >> > >>> >> So far Harmony has only EUT3.3 in testing. It looks like > it > >> >> > >>> >> is > >> >> > > >> >> > time > >> >> > > >> >> > >>> to > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> >> include EUT3.4 now. Your suggestions/comments are welcome. > >> >> > >>> > > >> >> > >>> > Skip 3.4 and go straight to the 3.5 stream tests [1]. > >> >> > >>> > > >> >> > >>> > It would be prudent to test using the latest milestone build > >> >> > >>> > first > >> >> > > >> >> > [2], > >> >> > > >> >> > >>> > but if we want to remain current then catching any issues > >> >> > >>> > earlier > >> >> > >>> > in > >> >> > > >> >> > the > >> >> > > >> >> > >>> > integration builds would be the thing to do. > >> >> > >>> > > >> >> > >>> > How about running then using the Apache infrastructure, which > >> >> > >>> > would > >> >> > > >> >> > give > >> >> > > >> >> > >>> > us better control of the jobs and insight into the failures? > >> >> > >>> > > >> >> > >>> > [1] http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/ > >> >> > >>> > [2] > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.5M3-200810301917/ > >> >> >index.php > >> >> > > >> >> > >>> > Regards, > >> >> > >>> > Tim > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Gregory > >> > > > > > >
