Hi chunrong,Regis and I will try to run EUT35 on the linux32. On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, chunrong lai <[email protected]> wrote:
> I run EUT35 in windows so far. As to EUT33, I run it in both windows and > linux. > Thanks. > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Nathan Beyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Are you doing both Windows and Linux? I'm just doing Windows, Vista to > > specific. > > > > -Nathan > > > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:08 PM, chunrong lai <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Thanks. I'd like to have a try. > > > Maybe you can also try the java command line running (after clean > > > extraction) and post the running results? > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Nathan Beyer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Maybe the difference is the milestone I'm testing. Have you tried > > >> moving to the next milestone release? > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:26 AM, chunrong lai <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > Thanks. > > >> > (1) My default JRE is also Harmony JVM. > > >> > I tried to set public JRE as SUN JRE and specify Harmony VM with > > >> "-vm" > > >> > in runtests.bat but just get same results as my previous running. > > >> > > > >> > (2) I think that there are not two JVM executables if run it with > java > > >> > command lines. So the harness issue does not exist if we can > reproduce > > >> the > > >> > error there. > > >> > Yes. There are two java executables in scripts based running, > like > > >> the > > >> > "jvm" and "vm" option for runtests.bat or the java executable in > path > > or > > >> in > > >> > eut.run.properties (for test.xml). > > >> > > > >> > java -jar > > >> > eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.0.v20070606.jar > -data > > >> > workspace -application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner -file test.xml > > >> jdttext > > >> > -Dos=linux -Dws=gtk -Darch=x86 -Dclean=true -propertyfile > > >> eut.run.properties > > >> > -logger org.apache.tools.ant.DefaultLogger > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Nathan Beyer <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> It must be the 'jvm' property in that file. When I add that, it > uses > > >> >> the Harmony JRE to run the tests. However, the test harness is > still > > >> >> run with the public JRE (in my case, Sun's JRE). > > >> >> > > >> >> Would you mind trying to add "-vm path/to/harmony" to runtests and > > >> >> seeing what results to get from a clean start? I'd like to know if > > >> >> you're getting the same failures. The console output doesn't show > > >> >> much, but when you look at the results, no tests were run and the > log > > >> >> shows some weird errors in equinox. > > >> >> > > >> >> -Nathan > > >> >> > > >> >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:47 AM, chunrong lai < > > [email protected]> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > I run it with > > >> >> > runtests -properties eut.run.properties jdtcorebuilder > > >> >> > > > >> >> > or > > >> >> > D:\eclipse-testing>java -jar > > >> >> > > > >> > eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar > > >> >> > -application org.eclipse.test.coretestapplication -data workspace > > -dev > > >> >> bin > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultFormatter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder.BuilderTests.xml > > >> >> > -testPluginName org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder -className > > >> >> > org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder.BuilderTests -os win32 -ws > win32 > > >> -arch > > >> >> > x86 > > >> >> > after manual clean/extraction. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I also tried "runtests -properties eut.run.properties" and saw > > those > > >> >> > jdtcorebuilder errors are reproducible. > > >> >> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Nathan Beyer < > [email protected] > > > > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> When I don't specificy "-vm", then it uses the 'java' executable > > in > > >> my > > >> >> >> path that Sun's public JRE installed, for all invocations. All I > > have > > >> >> >> set in my properties file is the "J2SE-1.5" property. What does > > the > > >> >> >> "jvm" property do? > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> I presume you're running "runtests -properties > eut.run.properties > > >> all". > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> -Nathan > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:19 PM, chunrong lai < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> > hi, Nathan: > > >> >> >> > I have not tried 3.5M4 but just tried 3.5M3. > > >> >> >> > According to the attched "Readme.htm", one only needs to > > >> specify > > >> >> the > > >> >> >> > (J2SE) item of eut.run.properties (I attached mine) and then > run > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > runtests -properties <path to properties file> [-os <operating > > >> >> system>] > > >> >> >> [-ws > > >> >> >> > <windowing system>] [-arch <architecture>] [-noclean] [-vm > <path > > to > > >> >> java > > >> >> >> > executable>][-Dtest.target=performance][targetname1 > targetname2 > > >> >> >> targetname3 > > >> >> >> > etc...] > > >> >> >> > for that. You can read the "Requirements" session in it. > It > > >> seems > > >> >> >> that > > >> >> >> > the requirements (winzip, ant) are minimum. > > >> >> >> > Detailed steps of the testing can be found in > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-PDE-Automation/automation.html(around > > >> >> >> > Fig 13). > > >> >> >> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Nathan Beyer < > > [email protected] > > >> > > > >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> I've been trying to recreate these errors, can anyone share > the > > >> >> >> >> specific commands, settings and tools being used? > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> I'm trying this with the 3.5M4 builds and I can't even get > the > > >> 'ant' > > >> >> >> >> test to run when Harmony is the bootstrapping JRE and the JRE > > >> running > > >> >> >> >> the actual tests. > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> -Nathan > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Gregory Shimansky > > >> >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> >> >> > On 7 January 2009 Huang, Eric wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> Did not cath this one earlier. What is the > > >> jrt.core.tests.builder > > >> >> >> >> >> about? It > > >> >> >> >> >> almost failed completely. > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > It looks like almost all tests fail with the same exception > > >> >> message: > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > Build path contains duplicate > > >> >> >> >> > entry: > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > 'D:harmony.cc/trunk/working_vm/build/windows_x86_msvc_release/deploy/jdk/jre/bin/default/gc_gen.jar' > > >> >> >> >> > for project 'Project' > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > Interesting how there is no '/' or '\' after D: in the path > > >> name. > > >> >> Is > > >> >> >> it > > >> >> >> >> > a > > >> >> >> >> > valid path in win32? > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> Eric > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- > > >> >> >> >> >> From: chunrong lai [mailto:[email protected]] > > >> >> >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:32 PM > > >> >> >> >> >> To: [email protected] > > >> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: testing for the newer EUT > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> After works on HARMONY-6020 now we get 98.42% pass rate > for > > >> 26416 > > >> >> >> test > > >> >> >> >> >> cases when running EUT35 in win32 platform as below. > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> Tests > > >> >> >> >> >> Failures Errors Success rate > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.ui.tests 2143 > > >> >> >> >> >> 19 1 99.07% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model 11138 > > >> >> >> >> >> 0 6 99.95% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler 10216 > > >> >> >> >> >> 17 0 99.83% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.builder 195 > > >> >> >> >> >> 0 184 5.64% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.performance 1 > > >> >> >> >> >> 0 0 100.00% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.team.tests.core 17 > > >> >> >> >> >> 0 0 100.00% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.update.tests 131 > > >> >> >> >> >> 0 0 100.00% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.core.expressions.tests 98 > > >> >> >> >> >> 0 0 100.00% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.osgi.tests 504 > > >> >> >> >> >> 48 101 70.44% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.core.tests.resources 914 > > >> >> >> >> >> 7 29 96.06% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.core.tests.runtime 389 > > >> >> >> >> >> 1 0 99.74% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.compare.tests 80 > > >> >> >> >> >> 0 0 100.00% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.ant.tests.core 85 > > >> >> >> >> >> 0 0 100.00% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.releng.tests 5 > > >> >> >> >> >> 0 0 100.00% > > >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests 500 > > >> >> >> >> >> 0 0 100.00% > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> Totally: > > 26416 > > >> >> >> >> >> 92 321 98.42% > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> More details are posted in HARMONY-6062. > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> regards, > > >> >> >> >> >> chunrong > > >> >> >> >> >> Managed Runtime Technology Center, Intel > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Nathan Beyer < > > >> [email protected] > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> > I posted a comment about this on the JIRA issue - I > think > > >> this > > >> >> is > > >> >> >> >> >> > related to a class loading problem I found a few weeks > > ago. > > >> The > > >> >> >> >> >> > ClassNotFoundError looked familiar - I reduced it to a > > >> complex > > >> >> >> >> >> > cyclical class dependency that DRLVM couldn't load. > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6020 > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:32 PM, chunrong lai > > >> >> >> >> >> > <[email protected]> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> > > hi, colleagues: > > >> >> >> >> >> > > I'd like to update my running status of EUT35 with > > you. > > >> As > > >> >> >> >> >> > > reported > > >> >> >> >> >> > > in HARMONY-6062, I have not been able to run EUT35 > with > > >> >> Harmony > > >> >> >> >> >> > > (although it > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > is > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > fine to run EUT33 with it). > > >> >> >> >> >> > > The failure can be reproduced with the long java > > command > > >> >> line > > >> >> >> >> >> > > option > > >> >> >> >> >> > > "java -jar > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > >> > eclipse\plugins\org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.200.v20080825-1800.jar > > >> >> >> >> >> > > -application org.eclipse.test.uitestapplication -data > > >> >> workspace > > >> >> >> >> >> > > -dev > > >> >> >> >> >> > > bin > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > formatter=org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.XMLJUnitResultForm > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > >atter,d:\eclipse-testing\eclipse\org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSui > > >> >> >> >> >> >te.xml > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > -testPluginName org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests -className > > >> >> >> >> >> > > org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests.JdtTextTestSuite -os win32 > > -ws > > >> >> win32 > > >> >> >> >> >> > > -arch > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > x86". > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > I also attached the output file in the JIRA, where I > > guess > > >> the > > >> >> >> root > > >> >> >> >> >> > > cause are from some Harmony jar file constrains, > > "!MESSAGE > > >> >> >> Missing > > >> >> >> >> >> > > Constraint: Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: > > >> JavaSE-1.6". > > >> >> >> >> >> > > Another interesting point is that after the test > case > > >> had > > >> >> >> >> >> > > successfully runed (so the configuration phase has > been > > >> >> finished) > > >> >> >> >> >> > > with > > >> >> >> >> >> > > RI (with above command), it would be no problem for > > Harmony > > >> to > > >> >> >> run > > >> >> >> >> >> > > it > > >> >> >> >> >> > > again. This > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > somehow > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > supports our guess of some verification failures in > the > > >> >> >> >> >> > > configuration > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > phase. > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:37 PM, chunrong lai > > >> >> >> >> >> > > <[email protected]> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> > >> I am running the tests, not finished yet. > > >> >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > >> Thanks. > > >> >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Tim Ellison > > >> >> >> >> >> > >> <[email protected] > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> > >wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> Are you looking at this Chunrong? > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> Tim Ellison wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > chunrong lai wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> So far Harmony has only EUT3.3 in testing. It > > looks > > >> >> like > > >> >> >> it > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> is > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > time > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> to > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> >> include EUT3.4 now. Your suggestions/comments are > > >> >> welcome. > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > Skip 3.4 and go straight to the 3.5 stream tests > > [1]. > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > It would be prudent to test using the latest > > milestone > > >> >> build > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > first > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > [2], > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > but if we want to remain current then catching any > > >> issues > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > earlier > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > in > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > the > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > integration builds would be the thing to do. > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > How about running then using the Apache > > infrastructure, > > >> >> which > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > would > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > give > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > us better control of the jobs and insight into the > > >> >> failures? > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > [1] > http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/ > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > [2] > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.5M3-200810301917/ > > >> >> >> >> >> >index.php > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > Regards, > > >> >> >> >> >> > >>> > Tim > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > -- > > >> >> >> >> > Gregory > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > -- Yours sincerely, Charles Lee China Software Development Lab, IBM
