Nathan Beyer wrote:
I changed most of the issues from 5M10 to Unknown, as they were issues
that existed with M9 and either didn't show up until code freeze or
didn't get looked at.
We just need to get in the practice of leaving issues unknown until
they're fixed and then mark the fix version.
+1 on this, although if someone feels a bug is truly must-fix for a
particular milestone then I think they should target it as such.
Regards,
Oliver
I would like to see the NOTICE and README issues fixed or commented
on. I think Tim was working on one of them.
-Nathan
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Oliver Deakin
<[email protected]> wrote:
Yep, you're totally correct - I'd missed those last issues. As you say, I
think HARMONY-6193 and HARMONY-6155 are must fix, but are not functional so
do not block testing.
Does anyone think that any of the other issues in [1] are must-fix for M10?
My personal feeling is that they are not and can be moved to an M11 target,
but please speak up if you feel differently.
Regards,
Oliver
[1]
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310050&fixfor=12313869
Tim Ellison wrote:
I still see a bunch of JIRA issues flagged as to be fixed in M10. I'm
guessing these are mis-labeled except HARMONY-6193 and HARMONY-6155.
Regards,
Tim
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Let's consider repo revision r780017 as M10 - I've just run all the
classlib tests on Windows XP x86 and they have all passed successfully
for me, so no adverse effects from the recent changes.
Does anyone have any more test results for any other platforms? It would
be nice to have at least Linux x86 (and perhaps linux x86_64) if
possible...
Im going to try and do some app testing as best I can this week - if
anyone gets any time to do this, please post your results here.
Regards,
Oliver
Sian January wrote:
Tests are still looking good for me on Windows after Mark's commit.
2009/5/29 Mark Hindess <[email protected]>:
Applied at r780017. (Sorry I was a bit slow; I was too busy relaxing
in
the sun.)
-Mark.
In message <[email protected]>, Oliver Deakin writes:
Looks like the patch has 2 committers supporting - I'm also +1 to
fixing
the test crashes and if the patch for HARMONY-6132 does this without
affecting any of the other tests, then Im also +1 to the patch. Please
go ahead and commit it as soon as possible so we can begin final
testing.
Regards,
Oliver
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2009/5/28, Mark Hindess <[email protected]>:
[skipped]
I also had two test crashes:
org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.SocketTest
org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.SSLSocketImplTest
which were both fixed by Ilya's patch in HARMONY-6132.
I think it would be good to apply the patch from HARMONY-6132
before M10.
Does anyone else support/oppose this?
The fix looks reasonable and the issue is important enough to fix
it in M10
.
--
Alexey
Regards,
Mark.
--
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number 7415
98.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU
--
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU
--
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
