On 04/06/2009, Mark Hindess <[email protected]> wrote: > > In message <[email protected]>, > > sebb writes: > > > > On 04/06/2009, Mark Hindess <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > In message <[email protected]>, > > > Mark Hindess writes: > > > > > > > In message <[email protected]>, Mark > Hindess > > > > writes: > > > > > > > > > > Committed in r781482. There were no code changes so this > > > > > update doesn't impact any existing testing. > > > > > > > > Just to clarify, we still need to fix the content of (at least) > > > > the top-level federation build NOTICE file for M10. > > > > > > Based on the discussion on this list, my reading of the thread at: > > > > > > http://markmail.org/thread/shzezyoalnydbflq > > > > > > and some reading of other NOTICE files, I think we just need > > > something like the attached patch for M10. > > > > > > Can I have committer approval and/or comments please? My intention > > > would be to apply the patch twice (to the top-level and classlib > > > NOTICE files). > > > > Most of the patch appears to be the license - PERMISSION - for ICU4J, > > and should therefore be in the LICENSE file. > > > It is also in the LICENSE file. If you think the it should not be > reproduced in full in NOTICE then what would be the minimal sufficient > content with respect to ICU4J for the NOTICE file?
+Portions of Apache Harmony's Class Library TEXT module contain JavaDoc +derived from the ICU project. +Copyright (c) 1995-2008 International Business Machines Corporation and others Remove the lines containing ===============. > Regards, > > -Mark > > >
