On 04/06/2009, Mark Hindess <[email protected]> wrote: > > In message <[email protected]>, > sebb > > writes: > > > > On 04/06/2009, Mark Hindess <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > In message > <[email protected]>, > > > sebb writes: > > > > > > > > On 04/06/2009, Mark Hindess <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In message > <[email protected]>, > > > > > Mark Hindess writes: > > > > > > > > > > > In message <[email protected]>, Mark > > > > > > Hindess writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Committed in r781482. There were no code changes so this > > > > > > > update doesn't impact any existing testing. > > > > > > > > > > > > Just to clarify, we still need to fix the content of (at least) > > > > > > the top-level federation build NOTICE file for M10. > > > > > > > > > > Based on the discussion on this list, my reading of the thread at: > > > > > > > > > > http://markmail.org/thread/shzezyoalnydbflq > > > > > > > > > > and some reading of other NOTICE files, I think we just need > > > > > something like the attached patch for M10. > > > > > > > > > > Can I have committer approval and/or comments please? My intention > > > > > would be to apply the patch twice (to the top-level and classlib > > > > > NOTICE files). > > > > > > > > Most of the patch appears to be the license - PERMISSION - for ICU4J, > > > > and should therefore be in the LICENSE file. > > > > > > > > > It is also in the LICENSE file. If you think the it should not be > > > reproduced in full in NOTICE then what would be the minimal sufficient > > > content with respect to ICU4J for the NOTICE file? > > > > +Portions of Apache Harmony's Class Library TEXT module contain JavaDoc > > +derived from the ICU project. > > +Copyright (c) 1995-2008 International Business Machines Corporation and > othe > > rs > > > > Remove the lines containing ===============. > > > Thanks. > > I've attached another patch (which also modifies and existing instance > of "Harmony" to "Apache Harmony" for consistency) for committer approval > and/or comments.
Looks OK. > Regards, > > Mark. > > >
