On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Mark Hindess <[email protected]> wrote: > > In message <[email protected]>, Tim Ellison writes: >> >> I appreciate sebb's review and comments. It would have been good to >> hear them during the two week freeze leading up to the vote rather >> than after the vote was concluded :-) > > This comment isn't entirely fair. Sebb's initial review comments > were about the binaries which we only created after the release was > "completed". This is one reason why I had more sympathy for his view > that the release should be cancelled. > > I also appreciate sebb's comments. So, while he could have made them > by building our source and reviewing the resulting binaries, perhaps we > should attempt to make this kind of review easier?
Don't we have binary builds coming out of Hudson periodically? > > It is tricky to see how to do this while still placing the emphasis on > voting on source releases. > > It would be more work but perhaps we should create "minimal" binaries > (one hdk bundle should be sufficient perhaps one windows and one linux) > at the start of the feature freeze period? > > Any thoughts? > > Regards, > Mark. > > >
