In message <3b3f27c61003091615v35532a30xc24cf282e7e69...@mail.gmail.com>, Natha n Beyer writes: > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Mark Hindess > <mark.hind...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > In message <4b965407.8000...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes: > >> > >> I appreciate sebb's review and comments. It would have been good > >> to hear them during the two week freeze leading up to the vote > >> rather than after the vote was concluded :-) > > > > This comment isn't entirely fair. Sebb's initial review comments > > were about the binaries which we only created after the release was > > "completed". This is one reason why I had more sympathy for his > > view that the release should be cancelled. > > > > I also appreciate sebb's comments. So, while he could have made them > > by building our source and reviewing the resulting binaries, perhaps > > we should attempt to make this kind of review easier? > > Don't we have binary builds coming out of Hudson periodically?
Indeed. Though they are built from svn directly rather than from svn via source artifacts, so I worry we'd miss something that would affect the release. -Mark.
