Hmmm... OK, let's deferring that to the next milestone. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13/Dec/2010 15:40, Ray Chen wrote: > > FYI. > > This defect should be fixed in this milestone, see > > http://s.apache.org/harmony/roadmap mentioned by Mark > > I see it is targeted to this milestone, I'm questioning whether that is > correct. > > Why do you think it needs to be fixed now rather than deferring to the > next milestone? > > Regards, > Tim > > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On 13/Dec/2010 08:23, Ray Chen wrote: > >>> Hi Comitters, > >>> I have reviewed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6656, > >> seems > >>> look good. > >>> I remember that there should be at least two committers to agree to > apply > >> a > >>> patch during code freeze time, right? > >>> > >>> Does anyone else can help to review this patch? > >> > >> During freeze time we only apply patches that are resolving blocking > >> issues for the release to ensure we retain stability. > >> > >> Is this a regression from behavior that worked in the 5.0M15 milestone? > >> (I don't think so) or is it a major failure that means we should restart > >> testing? > >> > >> I suggest this may be a candidate for defering until the next milestone. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Tim > >> > > > > > > > -- Regards, Ray Chen
