Hi Tim, I think I understand now, we should fix it before the code freeze. Currently, let's just move the target out to a later date.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13/Dec/2010 15:49, Ray Chen wrote: > > Hmmm... OK, let's deferring that to the next milestone. > > If it wasn't fixed before the code freeze, then there needs to be a good > reason why it is being fixed during the testing and publication period. > It's the only way we can get stability during testing -- otherwise the > code is changing and we never converge on a milestone. > > If you think this needs to be fixed, just say why, otherwise we'll move > the target out to a later date. > > Regards, > Tim > > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On 13/Dec/2010 15:40, Ray Chen wrote: > >>> FYI. > >>> This defect should be fixed in this milestone, see > >>> http://s.apache.org/harmony/roadmap mentioned by Mark > >> > >> I see it is targeted to this milestone, I'm questioning whether that is > >> correct. > >> > >> Why do you think it needs to be fixed now rather than deferring to the > >> next milestone? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Tim > >> > >> > >>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 13/Dec/2010 08:23, Ray Chen wrote: > >>>>> Hi Comitters, > >>>>> I have reviewed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6656, > >>>> seems > >>>>> look good. > >>>>> I remember that there should be at least two committers to agree to > >> apply > >>>> a > >>>>> patch during code freeze time, right? > >>>>> > >>>>> Does anyone else can help to review this patch? > >>>> > >>>> During freeze time we only apply patches that are resolving blocking > >>>> issues for the release to ensure we retain stability. > >>>> > >>>> Is this a regression from behavior that worked in the 5.0M15 > milestone? > >>>> (I don't think so) or is it a major failure that means we should > restart > >>>> testing? > >>>> > >>>> I suggest this may be a candidate for defering until the next > milestone. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Tim > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > -- Regards, Ray Chen
