Looks a good plan for the version alignment. +1 Best regards, Ruilong Huo
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Yandong Yao <y...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 for consistence > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 to this recommendation. It has been a bit confusing keeping track of > > versions. The Apache HAWQ version update is fairly simple. Now is the > time > > to make such an update. I imagine it will get harder the more time passes > > on and the more the community grows. > > > > This will impact Jira versioning for our upcoming Apache HAWQ incubating > > release. I will take care of that as part of the release process. > > > > Thanks, > > -=e > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Vineet Goel <vvin...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi HAWQ dev community, > > > > > > > > > Over the last few months, many users in the HAWQ community have > expressed > > > confusion about Apache HAWQ incubating release versions as compared to > > > Pivotal HDB release version numbering. Since Pivotal’s donation of HAWQ > > > codebase to Apache in September 2015, the community has grown, and > users > > of > > > Apache HAWQ as well as HDB have participated and sought help from the > > HAWQ > > > dev/user community via mailing lists. > > > > > > > > > With my Pivotal representation on this topic, I’m proposing Pivotal > team > > to > > > make an effort to align commercial releases of HDB based on Apache HAWQ > > > releases as much as possible. And, as part of the proposal, the > > commercial > > > HDB versions should also be aligned with the Apache HAWQ release > > > versioning. The net result of this alignment at Pivotal will likely > > result > > > in higher Apache HAWQ release cadence and collaboration, plus lesser > user > > > confusion. I have seen this model work well in other Apache communities > > > like Apache Ambari and more, in conjunction with the respective > > commercial > > > releases. > > > > > > > > > Such an alignment on the versioning could quickly be achieved by doing > a > > > one-time version bump of upcoming Apache HAWQ release to 2.2.0.0 > (versus > > > 2.1.0.0) as there is no way to lower the version on the other end. > Would > > > the community & the Release Manager support such a version string > change > > to > > > help Pivotal align their HDB releases to Apache HAWQ releases? I > believe > > > such an alignment will benefit the joint user community significantly. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Vineet > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Ed Espino* > > *esp...@apache.org <esp...@apache.org>* > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Yandong >
