On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Ryan Rawson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Should we ship 0.20.5 with the fixes as is? The bug is very rare, and > while some people might come across it, it is in 0.20.4 which is known > to be bad. > > We need to get a better 0.20 out there than 0.20.4. What we have is > pretty good, and we can fix the next issue in 0.20.6. > > Actually that sounds fair to me. Ignore my -1 conditional on us doing an 0.20.6 sometime in the next couple weeks. I'll try to do some cluster testing this week to actually put a +1 in instead of just retracting a -1 :) -Todd > -ryan > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Unfortunately -1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2670affects > > branch as well. > > > > I'm working on a fix, will target both branch and trunk, but may be a > couple > > days before we can thoroughly test it (this bug is devious) > > > > -Todd > > > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I've posted an hbase 0.20.5 release candidate 2 here: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-2/ > >> > >> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.5? > >> > >> It has 18 fixes: http://su.pr/1prW9y > >> > >> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes > >> Friday, the 11th of June. > >> > >> Yours, > >> Your HBase Homies > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
