This is a slippery slope. --- On Tue, 6/8/10, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.5 Release Candidate 2 as > hbase-0.20.5? > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 7:26 PM > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Ryan > Rawson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Should we ship 0.20.5 with the fixes as is? The > bug is very rare, and > > while some people might come across it, it is in > 0.20.4 which is known > > to be bad. > > > > We need to get a better 0.20 out there than > 0.20.4. What we have is > > pretty good, and we can fix the next issue in 0.20.6. > > > > > Actually that sounds fair to me. Ignore my -1 conditional > on us doing an > 0.20.6 sometime in the next couple weeks. > > I'll try to do some cluster testing this week to actually > put a +1 in > instead of just retracting a -1 :) > > -Todd > > > > -ryan > > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Unfortunately -1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2670affects > > > branch as well. > > > > > > I'm working on a fix, will target both branch and > trunk, but may be a > > couple > > > days before we can thoroughly test it (this bug > is devious) > > > > > > -Todd > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Stack <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> I've posted an hbase 0.20.5 release candidate > 2 here: > > >> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-2/ > > >> > > >> Should we release this candidate as hbase > 0.20.5? > > >> > > >> It has 18 fixes: http://su.pr/1prW9y > > >> > > >> Please take it for a test spin if you have a > chance. Vote closes > > >> Friday, the 11th of June. > > >> > > >> Yours, > > >> Your HBase Homies > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Todd Lipcon > > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >
