Bill,
I believe using CDH3B*2* will get you what you want.
ASF HBase 0.90 will not be compatible with secure versions of Hadoop, which
includes CDH3B3.
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
- Piet Hein (via Tom White)
--- On Tue, 12/21/10, Bill Graham <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Bill Graham <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: provide a 0.20-append tarball?
> To: [email protected], [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2010, 11:41 PM
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Just to make sure I'm clear, are you saying that HBase 0.90.0 is
> incompatible with CDH3b3 due to the security changes?
>
> We're just getting going with HBase and have been running 0.90.0rc1 on
> an un-patched version of Hadoop in dev. We were planning on upgrading
> to CDH3b3 to get the sync patches.
>
> thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > The latest CDH3 beta includes security changes that
> currently HBase 0.90 and trunk don't incorporate. Of course
> we can help out with clear HBase issues, but for security
> exceptions or similar, what about that? Do we draw a line?
> Where?
> >
> > I've looked over the CDH3B3 installation documentation
> but have not installed it nor do presently use it.
> >
> > If we draw a line, then as an ASF community we should
> have a fallback option somewhere in ASF-land for the user to
> try. Vanilla Hadoop is not sufficient for HBase. Therefore,
> I propose we make a Hadoop 0.20-append tarball available.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting
> back.
> > - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
