Were the comments of actual HDFS developers the majority of them?
I probably helped less but I have larger concerns about the long term viability
of Hadoop of which the situation with -append is only one symptom. Somebody
needs to say something.
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
- Piet Hein (via Tom White)
--- On Thu, 12/23/10, Ryan Rawson <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Ryan Rawson <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: provide a 0.20-append tarball?
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, December 23, 2010, 2:49 PM
> Looks like the fight does not go
> well. A lot of hdfs developers are
> concerned that it would detract resources. I'm not
> sure who's resources.
>
> I hope my 13-15 month commented helped... I've heard "wait for the
> next" version before and I am not interested in it. If that indeed
> worked, a year ago we'd have a stable working sync/hlog recovery
> support.
>
> -ryan
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Stack <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Stack <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Let me ask Dhruba what he thinks about making a
> 0.20-append release
> >> (He's the release manager). Will also sound out
> the hadoop pmc since
> >> they'll have an opinion.
> >>
> >
> > I asked Dhruba. He's fine w/ a release off tip of
> branch--0.20-append.
> >
> > I just wrote a message to general up on hadoop to
> gauge what hadoopers
> > think of the idea.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
>
