On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 05:46, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > Thanks for the below input and the refresher on the apache way Bernd. > It helps. > > First off, in general, this PMC is pretty good at keeping it public. > Quite a few questions up on private are first met with the response, > 'why is this on the private mailing list?'. You can see for yourself > being an Apache Member (I just OK'd your request to join the private > mailing list too). > > More below. > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Bernd Fondermann > <bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 06:30, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >> There are two things here I think got mixed up. >> a. who makes decisions >> b. where are decisions being made >> >> Decisions about a project are made on public mailing lists. Only very >> few things are to be discussed in private (new committers, new PMC >> members, personal conflicts, security issues). >> Discussing a new logo does not belong on closed lists, IMHO. > > Your quote from my mail is my recognizing that the logo arrival is > dirty and am asking forgiveness for not operating sufficiently out in > the open. > > The logo process was not done on these lists because it started out > complicated and remained so till the end.
That's the first time I hear that having a new logo could be such a pain. Congrats to HBase to come to a decision. > If folks want to redo this process because it was not done out in the > open, lets do it. No... Maybe in a few years, when 90's-style logos come out of fashion ;-P Bernd Bernd
