Hi,
For upcoming Apache James 3.0, we have a call for a new logo at
http://james.apache.org/#logo
We already have a few proposals, and the call is still ongoing. We will
open the vote to everyone when james 3.0-final will be released, but I
expect some discussions on the choice, and maybe some reactions against
any change. I'm sure we will have many votes because people like that
kind of things. However, we will loose some control on the project
image... It's a bit a trade-off... So if HBase PMC came to a agreement,
I think it's really fine and we should trust all the process that occurred.
I can't find back the article where it is explained why software
developers are no good at graphic/color design (it was very
instructive...), so I think using a professional company like you did is
a good idea.
Btw, will
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12492480/H.gif be the
avatar for twitter account...? If such, it would be nice to have HBASE
written down the big H as baseline.
Eric
On 01/09/11 21:02, Andrew Purtell wrote:
From: Ted Dunning<tdunn...@maprtech.com>
Oh lordie, let's not. Logo discussions drown out everything else and never
result in getting a better logo.
At most, how about just having an up or down vote on this one logo. Then
everybody can get on with something important.
+1
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via
Tom White)
----- Original Message -----
From: Ted Dunning<tdunn...@maprtech.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2011 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: Decisionmaking [was: Re: New HBase Logo]
Oh lordie, let's not. Logo discussions drown out everything else and never
result in getting a better logo.
At most, how about just having an up or down vote on this one logo. Then
everybody can get on with something important.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Stack<st...@duboce.net> wrote:
If folks want to redo this process because it was not done out in the
open, lets do it.
--
Eric
http://about.echarles.net
