I agree with Stack. >From 0.94 to 1.0, the numbering makes sense. Let's first get 0.92 out the door :-)
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > It's possible a release of 0.20.20X (X=5 I think) as Hadoop 1.0 is > imminent. > > > > The Hadoop 1.0 release is an acknowledgement of reality -- 0.20 branch > is in production at many places. > > > > I know we agreed to separate HBase versioning from Hadoop versioning, > but if we continue to number HBase as 0.X after there is a Hadoop 1.0, > there is an implicit marketing message that we feel HBase is not as ready > as Hadoop. > > > > > > I propose that we consider, if and when Hadoop 1.0 is released, that we > release HBase 1.0 off of the 0.92 branch. A subsequent release off of trunk > could be 1.1 or 2.0 at the discretion of the RM and community consensus. > > > > Agreed. Was thinking 0.94 could e be 1.0.0 since its getting a load > of 0.89-fb branch forward-ports. Would have to come out right after > 0.92 though. > > St.Ack >
